A rather well researched and presented explanation and refutation of the Flynn effect by MrHerrIQ.

Permalink:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=148BFA89998282DA

                            Welcome to Dublin

This video depicts today’s Dublin. An ancient people have had mass immigration forced upon them against their will in order to make money for the rich. We are being displaced from our own country.

The original copy of this video was censored after it received over 40,000 views in just a few weeks.

Sweden’s liberal attitude to immigration & tolerance is causing a major problem for the Country’s future. Strong signs can already be seen. Swedish police & ambulance personnel cannot safely drive into certain City’s like Malmo. They are regurlarly attacked by Muslim immigrants, these areas have become Islamic ghettos.

,___,
[O.o] ~-~-~ Wise up people!
/)__)
-“— “-

Welcome to Sweden of Today

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/news/04120…

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/544417.aspx

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/390138.aspx

http://www.thelocal.se/12306/

A famous Danish journalist, Lars Hedegaard, said in March 2009:

“I think that the best prediction is that Sweden will have a muslim majority by 2049, so we know where that country is going.”

The main political opposition in Sweden is Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna)
http://www.sverigedemokraterna.se

Photos in the video mainly from:
http://www.freedigitalphotos.net

Photo of Lars Hedegaard from this excellent blogg:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/

Photos also from Nationell Idag:
http://www.nationellidag.se
(The editor of this nationalist newspaper mr Vavra Suk, was almost killed by 20 left-wing hooligans in February, 2009. To show support you can subscribe on that paper.)

Political parties in Europe:
Front National/Frankrike: http://www.frontnational.com/
British National Party/England: http://www.bnp.org.uk/
Vlaams Belang/belgien: http://www.vlaamsbelang.be/
Schweizerische Volkspartei/Schweiz: http://www.svp.ch/
Partij voor de vrijheid/Holland: http://www.pvv.nl/
Bündis Zukunft Österreich/Österrike: http://www.bzoe.at/
FPÖ/Österrike: http://www.fpoe.at/
Dansk Folkeparti/Danmark: http://www.danskfolkeparti.dk/
Lega Nord/Italien: http://www.leganord.org/
Sverigedemokraterna/Sverige: http://www.sverigedemokraterna.se

BNP News Team

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population. Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.

The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia. Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare. A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.

Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.  The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.

Finnish government floods nation with uncontrolled immigration then plans to use draconian hate-speech laws to silence dissent

By Henrik Holappa

The Finnish Department of Justice is now planning on suppressing even more of our freedom of speech here in Finland. The special legal group of the Department of Justice is now writing the blueprints of a new law that would especially focus on so-called “Internet Racism.”

The major newspaper in Finland, Helsingin Sanomat, reported of the suggested plan on their website here.

According to the new law suggestion, just clicking on an alleged “racist” or “white supremacist” website (whether it is David Duke’s, the Resistance Movement’s websites or any other prominent white’s civil rights movement’s website) that would be enough to sentence a Finnish citizen to 4 years in prison. I emphasize—just visiting a racist website would be enough to sentence someone to 4 years in prison.

A few studies have purported to prove that with the right environmental stimuli Black children would develop IQs
similar to those of White and Asian children. The Milwaukee Project was the most famous of these, and inevitably it
attracted plentiful media coverage in its heyday. It was reported that through intensive early childhood intervention and
stimulation, underprivileged, slum-dwelling Black children had their IQs increased 30 points in comparison with the
control group.[101] The Washington Post wrote triumphantly that the project’s success “settled once and for all” the
question of whether kids of poor socioeconomic backgrounds are held back by environment or by heredity.

Unfortunately for the egalitarians, their euphoric media bubble burst when the Milwaukee Project’s director, Rick
Haber, was convicted and imprisoned for embezzling government money. While this is not directly relevant to the
results of the project, it does call into question the trustworthiness of its director. Howard L. Garber, longtime associate
of Haber, in 1988 issued a report on the project that revealed the IQ gains were artificial, having been achieved by
intensive practice on problems similar to those on the Stanford-Binet test, and that the kids’ IQs declined steadily after
leaving the program, with the gains never translating into academic success. Ultimately their abilities matched at the
same level as that of the control group, which, of course, had no intervention. [102] [103]

Herman Spitz, in his book The Raising of Intelligence, documents dozens of similar programs that failed miserably to
raise the IQ of Blacks. In their initial stages, the media gave them extensive coverage and rave reviews, but little
coverage of their ultimate failure. The pattern of publicity is identical to that under Lysenkoism in the Soviet Union.
Over the years there were many media blitzes proclaiming the remarkable success of various early intervention
programs. With embarrassing regularity the touted program was allowed to sink into quiet disrepute while the media
trumpeted the miraculous results of another new approach. [104] [105] [106]

Another example of media “proof” that Black-White differences are environmental is the coverage of the Chicago
Black teacher, Marva Collins. One of the most famous personalities in American education, Collins has gotten
extensive media coverage, including adulatory articles in The New York Times and sumptuous praise on the television
show 60 Minutes. She claimed that seemingly “unteachable” inner-city children between 5 and 10-years-old had soared
in standardized tests under her teaching methods and were reading and comprehending Tolstoy, Plato, and
Shakespeare. In spite of such incredible claims, the media never asked Collins for hard scientific evidence to
substantiate her assertions, nor has her “miracle” been successfully duplicated by any other psychologists and educators
in controlled studies. These kinds of miraculous stories, ever popular in the mass media, for good reason never find
their way into the scrutiny afforded by scientific journals.[107]

- From My Awakening by David Duke

1916 in Virginia, large groups of Black school children
were divided in groups determined by the number of White and Black grandparents. All the Black subjects, pure or
partially Black, were raised in the Black community’s environment. The Blacks with four Black grandparents scored
the lowest in IQ. Blacks with three Black grandparents and one White - a bit higher; Blacks with two White
grandparents - higher still; and Blacks with three White grandparents scored highest in IQ among the Black children.[87]

The most recent studies of the 1990s show precisely the same results.
One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard
Weinberg and I. D. Waldman. All three are quite well known for their environmentalist opinions. The study analyzed
White, Black and mixed-race adopted children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was an
egalitarian’s dream, because the children’s adoptive parents had prestigious levels of income and education and were
antiracist enough to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong defender of racial equality and
maintained that environment played an almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr supports the
importance of heredity in causing individual differences within a race, but she has argued that the between-race
differences are mostly environmental.

The children in the study included adopted Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as well as the biological children of the White
adoptive couples. At the age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups, including the Blacks and
Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had to admit that the White children, whether
adopted or not, scored well above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children scored above the
Blacks.[88]

A decade later, when the children reached the average age 17, a follow-up study was conducted that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ
for Blacks in the region of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted children scored an average
of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the Black children, which is consistent with traditional studies of Black and White
IQ differences. In line with genetic theory, the half-White, half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly
between the adopted Whites and Blacks.[89]

Scarr and Weinberg reluctantly published their data from the follow-up survey, but they waited close to four years to do
so, almost as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured reasoning process, they still argued
that environment played a dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first paper, they also
admitted that genes had an important impact as well. Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
reanalyses of Scarr’s own data, that genes clearly comprise the dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted
children.[90] [91]

My Awakening - David Duke

…Many studies of Blacks and Whites take socioeconomic factors into account. They consistently find that even
those Blacks who come from high income and well-educated families still have markedly lower IQs than Whites.

SAT scores correlate very highly with IQ and the testing service has gathered information on the parental income,
education, and race of its test-takers. It finds that Black students with a household income of more than $70,000 a year and who have at least one parent who is a college graduate - score lower on the SAT than Whites from households that
make less than $20,000 annually and in which both parents are high-school dropouts. [79] [80] The most environmentally
disadvantaged group of Whites who take the SAT - score higher than the most environmentally advantaged group of
Blacks.

The psychological data for genetic explanations for poor Black performance in IQ are extensive and powerful. IQ
studies including Blacks, Whites, and Asians have extensively correlated many socioeconomic factors, including
family income, parental education level and occupation status, and school quality. Groups of low-income Whites with
low parental education levels and low parental occupation statuses consistently score higher in IQ than Blacks from
families of high income, high education levels and high occupation status. [81] [82]

- from My Awakening by David Duke