Hay!

BNP News Team

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population. Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.

The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan. Next in line is Somalia. Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare. A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.

Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.

More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.  The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.

joyshapes:

.

“We free marketeers have won the battle of ideas, but lost the battle of implementation”

Thank the proverbial lord for Daniel Hannan. While the EU continues down the road of socialism, centralization and fiscal insanity, Hannan’s voice in the Summit comes as a beacon of hope for those of us who haven’t lost all sense of individual liberty. Mr. Hannan has gained momentum since calling out British Labour leader Gordon Brown for his abandonment of values as prime minister early last year. Check out his YouTube channel for more:

http://www.youtube.com/user/DanHannanMEP

Methinks Mr. Ron Paul on the other side of the pond could take a few lesson in eloquence from Hannan ;)

fringeelements:

JoyShapes:

^Why Americans don’t need the government telling them what to eat. This graph shows the US federal subsidies for food production over a decade ending in 2005. As we can see, there is a HUGE contrast between what the US federal government recommends and what they subsidise. According to the Federal Nutrition Recommendations, meat and dairy should comprise approximately 25% of our intake. So why do these industries receive a full 75% of subsidies? In stark contrast, we see that fruit and veg only get 0.37% of subsidies! The lower the subsidies, the higher the pricing as it costs more for the industry to produce. So is it any wonder the US have an obesity problem? The solution is not to tax junk food, it is to ELIMINATE SUBSIDIES and accordingly eliminate price controls. Incentives do a lot more good than penalties.

fringeelements:

JoyShapes:

^Why Americans don’t need the government telling them what to eat. This graph shows the US federal subsidies for food production over a decade ending in 2005. As we can see, there is a HUGE contrast between what the US federal government recommends and what they subsidise. According to the Federal Nutrition Recommendations, meat and dairy should comprise approximately 25% of our intake. So why do these industries receive a full 75% of subsidies? In stark contrast, we see that fruit and veg only get 0.37% of subsidies!

The lower the subsidies, the higher the pricing as it costs more for the industry to produce. So is it any wonder the US have an obesity problem? The solution is not to tax junk food, it is to ELIMINATE SUBSIDIES and accordingly eliminate price controls. Incentives do a lot more good than penalties.

fringeelements:

Now that’s just direct land ownership.
On the land that is not directly owned by the state, people give up ~40% of the product of their labor to the state through taxation or inflation.
Lets be sure to blame the problems we have on the small and shrinking portion that is still free, clamor for more mob rule and call it “democracy” and then say freedom really means free stuff.

fringeelements:

Now that’s just direct land ownership.

On the land that is not directly owned by the state, people give up ~40% of the product of their labor to the state through taxation or inflation.

Lets be sure to blame the problems we have on the small and shrinking portion that is still free, clamor for more mob rule and call it “democracy” and then say freedom really means free stuff.